Will the FDA Efforts to Limit Salt be Successful?
Salt is an acquired taste and unfortunately too many of us have acquired it. Many people ask why there is so much sodium in restaurant foods and are learning that reducing salt intake is easier said than done.
Salt also known as sodium chloride has been used for generations in baked goods as a leavening and browning agent as well as assisting with product texture, structure and enhanced "mouth feel." It has seen increased use over the decades by food manufactures that utilize it as a cost effective option to extend product shelf life due to its preservative properties. One reason we may have seen more high fructose corn syrup used in shelf stable products such as breads and crackers over the years could be that it hides the unfavorable salty taste created by increased sodium-based additives used to reduce product waste from spoilage. The longer a product can safely sit on a shelf, the less loss for the company.
Last week it was reported that the FDA will begin working with the food industry and health experts to reduce processed sodium content in packaged foods over the next ten years. Here is why this may be a positive step forward.
Food Industry Focus - It is great that the first step in this salt reduction process focuses on changes from the food companies and not from restricting product availability or consumer choice. This is especially true since estimates suggest 77% or more of the sodium we consume comes from processed foods compared to the 12% sodium that is naturally occurring. Salt is "generally recognized as safe" under federal standards so manufactures are not limited regarding how much they can use in food production. They are only regulated to accurately report the amount of sodium per serving on nutrition labels. The food industry has been awaiting federal initiatives so Conagra, Pepsico, Kraft Foods, General Mills, and Sara Lee recently announced voluntary sodium reduction plans for their products.
FDA Backed Accountability - The Center for Science in the Public Interest first petitioned the FDA back in the early 1980's to regulate sodium content in foods. Although the CSPI has also shared apprehension about nearly 90 other food related issues over the years, they have been the push behind the sodium concerns in processed foods for years. In 2005, CSPI urged Congress to create a new FDA division to encourage food companies to reduce their salt content. The FDA regulates the majority of processed foods but year after year kicks the can down the road on this issue by pushing for voluntary reduction from the food industry without enforceable government backing. Perhaps with the potential of creating legal limits related to salt allowances, voluntary efforts from industry will be extremely cooperative this time around.
Improved Health Benefits with Limited Increased Efforts - The Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends we consume less than 2,300 mg of sodium each day. For specific population groups such as those with hypertension, blacks, the middle-aged, and older adults, the recommendation is to limit sodium intake to 1,500 mg per day while also consuming 4,700 mg of potassium per day. The correlation between salt intake and blood pressure are direct and the higher a person's blood pressure the higher the risks of stroke, heart disease, heart failure, and kidney disease. If manufactures reduce sodium content in processed foods, sodium content in diets will come down as well especially in those that find processed foods difficult to remove from their diets. While the message of reducing processed food consumption will continue, small hidden reductions of sodium in processed foods will help improve health more quickly as new habits are learned.
Reducing sodium can reduce disease and improve health. If your favorite products are still available on store shelves, provide a great taste for a fair price, and provide less sodium, we all benefit. This is frequently called "stealth health" or creating change and health benefits with minimal consumer impact or reduction in choice. It is unclear how fast we will see changes on our store shelves but indications suggest it may be sooner than later.
What do you think - Will these FDA initiated voluntary steps work this time? Is a 10-year plan reasonable?
Salt also known as sodium chloride has been used for generations in baked goods as a leavening and browning agent as well as assisting with product texture, structure and enhanced "mouth feel." It has seen increased use over the decades by food manufactures that utilize it as a cost effective option to extend product shelf life due to its preservative properties. One reason we may have seen more high fructose corn syrup used in shelf stable products such as breads and crackers over the years could be that it hides the unfavorable salty taste created by increased sodium-based additives used to reduce product waste from spoilage. The longer a product can safely sit on a shelf, the less loss for the company.
Last week it was reported that the FDA will begin working with the food industry and health experts to reduce processed sodium content in packaged foods over the next ten years. Here is why this may be a positive step forward.
Food Industry Focus - It is great that the first step in this salt reduction process focuses on changes from the food companies and not from restricting product availability or consumer choice. This is especially true since estimates suggest 77% or more of the sodium we consume comes from processed foods compared to the 12% sodium that is naturally occurring. Salt is "generally recognized as safe" under federal standards so manufactures are not limited regarding how much they can use in food production. They are only regulated to accurately report the amount of sodium per serving on nutrition labels. The food industry has been awaiting federal initiatives so Conagra, Pepsico, Kraft Foods, General Mills, and Sara Lee recently announced voluntary sodium reduction plans for their products.
FDA Backed Accountability - The Center for Science in the Public Interest first petitioned the FDA back in the early 1980's to regulate sodium content in foods. Although the CSPI has also shared apprehension about nearly 90 other food related issues over the years, they have been the push behind the sodium concerns in processed foods for years. In 2005, CSPI urged Congress to create a new FDA division to encourage food companies to reduce their salt content. The FDA regulates the majority of processed foods but year after year kicks the can down the road on this issue by pushing for voluntary reduction from the food industry without enforceable government backing. Perhaps with the potential of creating legal limits related to salt allowances, voluntary efforts from industry will be extremely cooperative this time around.
Improved Health Benefits with Limited Increased Efforts - The Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends we consume less than 2,300 mg of sodium each day. For specific population groups such as those with hypertension, blacks, the middle-aged, and older adults, the recommendation is to limit sodium intake to 1,500 mg per day while also consuming 4,700 mg of potassium per day. The correlation between salt intake and blood pressure are direct and the higher a person's blood pressure the higher the risks of stroke, heart disease, heart failure, and kidney disease. If manufactures reduce sodium content in processed foods, sodium content in diets will come down as well especially in those that find processed foods difficult to remove from their diets. While the message of reducing processed food consumption will continue, small hidden reductions of sodium in processed foods will help improve health more quickly as new habits are learned.
Reducing sodium can reduce disease and improve health. If your favorite products are still available on store shelves, provide a great taste for a fair price, and provide less sodium, we all benefit. This is frequently called "stealth health" or creating change and health benefits with minimal consumer impact or reduction in choice. It is unclear how fast we will see changes on our store shelves but indications suggest it may be sooner than later.
What do you think - Will these FDA initiated voluntary steps work this time? Is a 10-year plan reasonable?
![]() You will earn 3 SparkPoints |













.jpg)









Comments
Baked Potato to the rest of the dinner. I ask for no salt ans they said the only thing they could do not to salt the Bake Potato. The rest is already pre made that way. YACK!! - 11/10/2010 8:51:21 PM
- 4/30/2010 1:07:05 PM
I would think that most manufacturers could take at least 10% or more of the sodium out of products without any one even noticing.
I am one of the bad salt addicts. food just does not have much taste without it though I don't eat as much if it is low sodium so it might be a good thing.
I just do not like most herbs or pepper so salt is my main seasoning though I try to cut back when I can.
we do not eat out much at all but do used processed foods. - 4/28/2010 5:13:33 PM
As for the salt regulation. Go for it. I don't really care either way. I don't add salt to anything (unless I'm baking a cake) and don't necessarily care for the taste all that much. If you want to add salt later when you are cooking it then go for it. It's not like your going to pop your hamburger helper open at the store to eat it...you can wait until you get home to add the salt. - 4/28/2010 9:36:57 AM
I work really hard to reduce my sodium, removing as many processed foods as possible, cooking fresh, not adding salt. One fun night out with my family at a restaurant and my hard work is out the door. My fingers, face, and feet are noticeably swollen the next day. I look forward to the day that I can make wise choices from a menu (when people finally have to publish FULL nutritional info, not just fat and calories) and not have to pay the next day. Right now there are just not that many choices available at restaurants for people who care about their health. - 4/27/2010 10:51:02 PM
The less salt I consume ~ the easier it is to maintain my fluid engorged legs. - 4/27/2010 10:18:33 PM
I cook as salt free as possible for my husband, and it means more work, and fewer times to eat out, but it pays off in health benefits. - 4/27/2010 8:32:33 PM
While I generally don't like to see much government intervention in people's health choices, when government money (ie your tax dollars) is going to aid in treatment of illnesses that can be in part alleviated by better choices in diet, I believe there is some room for government to be involved. Especially when food companies are willing to partner with government agencies. This is particularly true here in Canada, where a significant portion of our taxes paid goes to fund health care services. I'm not sure how or whether new health care legislation in the US will affect public costs. - 4/27/2010 3:53:26 PM
I also think this will be good for those of us who do care. I try not to buy processed foods but that's not always possible for me (like boca burgers, i'm not usually home on weekends and get home late on most nights, so i wouldn't have time to make my own veggie patties)
If anything, at least this plan/step brings more attention to the issue of all the unnecessary salt added to food. - 4/27/2010 12:58:46 PM
What works is US using our buying power to, in effect, boycott high salt (and whatever else) products. If we buy the lower salt/no salt added products and eschew the high salt ones, then the food manufacturers get the message where it really counts - in their profit & loss. - 4/27/2010 11:54:20 AM
I think it's a sad statement that the government has to step in because we don't take control of our own lives.
I know consuming premade meals is sometimes necessary. I have done it and been there. I also know that even the most inept cook can make something that tastes better then the premade meals. - 4/27/2010 11:20:09 AM
I don't believe that government intervention is "essential" and I don't believe this to be such a huge health emergency that the FDA or any other government agency needs to get involved.
If this intrusion into people's daily lives doesn't stop soon, there won't be any freedoms left to preserve. - 4/27/2010 10:55:09 AM
NO.... government regulation will not regulate my salt intake!
What will they do next... come into my home and tell me what kind of bowel movements i should be having? - 4/27/2010 10:46:37 AM
Do we need more regulatory laws that won't be funded and follwed. No.
Thc capitalistic society has at its roots, the working theory that all will be honest, ethical, use supply side economics, and for those that cannot/will not follow these tenants, some regulations are put in place. Supposedly common sense is the most vital asset of capitalism.
The problem in placing more laws/regulations is huge. Everything from higher costs to high taxation comes into play. Do I want less sodium everywhere..absolutely! Can I count on any regulations being put in place that will be FUNDED consistently to do this. NO.
I'm tired of offending my neighbors across the pond and on the northern border with rhetoric and arrogance about how we, the US are so much better at health care and everything else when in fact we do have problems. Enough!
So, no I don't want any more FDA interference. Current funding to enforce current regulations is sparse and has been for decades. The same is true for the mess we are in with financial institutions, immigration law and just about everything there is a law for.
Until the government and lobbyists become a lot more transparent, I'll regulate myself, but thanks anyway.
- 4/27/2010 10:26:12 AM
Please Log In To Leave A Comment: Log in now ›