In the News: Functional Foods or "Franken-Foods"?
Call me old-fashioned, but when I want the health benefits of a tomato, I eat a tomato. If I want more Omega-3 fatty acids in my meals, I sprinkle some flax meal on my morning oatmeal. And if I want the antioxidant power of blueberries, I eat blueberries.
That said, I sometimes buy eggs with extra Omega-3s and OJ with added calcium. But you'll probably never find a carton of OJ fortified with Omega-3s in my shopping cart.
Why? To me, it just seems weird.
Omega-3's, when added to eggs, come from the flax seed that's fed to the chickens. (And eggs from chickens fed a diet of greens and insects naturally contain more Omega-3s than those from chickens who eat grains and soybeans.) And that calcium in your OJ? It contains some naturally, and the rest comes from calcium hydroxide (usually via limestone). Not too "out there" for me. But the Omega-3's came from sardines and anchovies. While I love oily fish (mmm, mackerel), the (imperceptible) fish oil in my OJ seems a bit too "Mad Science" to me.
Functional foods (think extra calcium in your OJ) are commonplace in the American diet, and fortified foods (think 100% of the recommended daily allowances vitamins and minerals in breakfast cereal) have been around even longer. Ever hear of rickets, goiters or pellagra? Nope. You can thank Vitamin D in milk, iodized salt and B vitamins in flour for that. Those foods are fortified to keep us healthy.
Functional foods could be seen as a way to multitask your meals. You can get more nutritional bang for your buck from peanut butter that's been enriched with beet and kale powders. You can indulge in chocolate without the guilt when it contains broccoli, blueberry and watermelon.
Or they could be seen as "Frankenfoods," a strange marriage of food and science. Do you really need broccoli in your chocolate?
From the NYT:
Am I behind the times or a food purist? Are you a fan of multitasking functional foods? What is your limit for functional foods? Broccoli in your peanut butter? Spider silk in your milk? Better yet: What functional foods would you create if you could be a food scientist?
That said, I sometimes buy eggs with extra Omega-3s and OJ with added calcium. But you'll probably never find a carton of OJ fortified with Omega-3s in my shopping cart.
Why? To me, it just seems weird.
Omega-3's, when added to eggs, come from the flax seed that's fed to the chickens. (And eggs from chickens fed a diet of greens and insects naturally contain more Omega-3s than those from chickens who eat grains and soybeans.) And that calcium in your OJ? It contains some naturally, and the rest comes from calcium hydroxide (usually via limestone). Not too "out there" for me. But the Omega-3's came from sardines and anchovies. While I love oily fish (mmm, mackerel), the (imperceptible) fish oil in my OJ seems a bit too "Mad Science" to me.
Functional foods (think extra calcium in your OJ) are commonplace in the American diet, and fortified foods (think 100% of the recommended daily allowances vitamins and minerals in breakfast cereal) have been around even longer. Ever hear of rickets, goiters or pellagra? Nope. You can thank Vitamin D in milk, iodized salt and B vitamins in flour for that. Those foods are fortified to keep us healthy.
Functional foods could be seen as a way to multitask your meals. You can get more nutritional bang for your buck from peanut butter that's been enriched with beet and kale powders. You can indulge in chocolate without the guilt when it contains broccoli, blueberry and watermelon.
Or they could be seen as "Frankenfoods," a strange marriage of food and science. Do you really need broccoli in your chocolate?
From the NYT:
Additionally, with recent rising costs in raw materials, flavorings and transport, many food companies are refocusing their research and development; instead of adding expensive ingredients like sun-dried tomatoes or honey-roasted almonds to existing products, the search is on for inexpensive “value-added” products that customers will pay extra for. Mars’s CocoaVia line of chocolate claims to offer health benefits because of high levels of antioxidants; an ounce of CocoaVia blueberry almond chocolate costs about $1.25, while an ounce of the same manufacturer’s Dove blueberry almond chocolate costs about 75 cents. In order to get the nutritional benefits from CocoaVia, the company recommends eating two bars a day — an investment of more than $700 and 4,000 fat grams in the course of a year.
Am I behind the times or a food purist? Are you a fan of multitasking functional foods? What is your limit for functional foods? Broccoli in your peanut butter? Spider silk in your milk? Better yet: What functional foods would you create if you could be a food scientist?
![]() You will earn 3 SparkPoints |
NEXT ENTRY > September is Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month









.jpg)













Comments
Example, how about the new version of Coke that has added vitamins ? It's still a Coke. It still has all the added sugar, chemicals and preservatives.
No, Franken foods are nothing more than a way for companies to make a buck. I can do with out, thank you.
- 3/18/2009 1:03:06 PM
The reason GM has been give a bad name is that big farmers have misused its originally benefical purpose. They have done things like make a crop resistant to pesticides and then doubled the amount they spray. Thats not how it is supposed to be used.
A lot of people are worried about global warming, but when gm can produce crops more resistant to heat or requiring less rain they say that it is unnatural. well you go ahead and starve to death while i enjoy my tasty seedless grapes. - 3/17/2009 1:46:01 PM
Now having said that, this idea of adding heretofore unknown nutrients to foods that never had them may not make sense, but how is it so different from taking a multi-vitamin to supplement one's diet? Multivitamins aren't food. They are synthesized supplements that your body can and will use. So what if CocoaVia has added anti-oxidants and people are willing to pay top dollar? That's simple capitalism, kids. - 1/11/2009 1:33:42 PM
But broccoli in PB? Weird.
Better to eat PB on apples or celery.
- 10/7/2008 11:23:57 AM
Cheers,
Maya - 9/30/2008 8:01:21 AM
People, please don't believe the paranoid line "GMOs cause cancer." Does anyone have actual lab studies that prove this? I didn't think so. We have been modifying plants and animals since prehistoric times!!! Take a biology class and stop believing everything you read on the internet.
The only "scary" thing about GMOs is that they are easier to grow and more profitable than other crops, which COULD result in farmers switching to growing things like corn and soybeans instead of wheat, thus causing wheat shortages. - 9/24/2008 10:14:36 AM
But if they add something healthy to a chocolate bar or something to make orange juice even better for you etc. then more power to those things. It save calories I guess so you can get all you rda vitamins and minerals without eating some of the things you might not like. It also caters to picky eaters like myself. - 9/23/2008 5:58:34 PM
- 9/23/2008 11:00:03 AM
While we're at it, forget about the orange juice, eat an orange instead. You're missing out on fiber (an very important dietary element) when you make juice.
- 9/22/2008 11:46:59 PM
I think it is crazy the combination of food items the manufacturers are coming up with...what happened to good ol' peanut butter and an apple? The real McCoy foods... - 9/22/2008 3:05:03 PM
Please Log In To Leave A Comment: Log in now ›